Fig. 3 , D and E . The graphs show means and SEs for the quantifications of EPHA1 tyrosine phosphorylation (pTyr, n = 5) and S906 phosphorylation (pS906, n = 5) normalized to EPHA1 levels. The P460L mutant fragment could not be reliably quantified given its very low level. ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001 for the comparison with WT using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F , HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with Flag-tagged EPHA1 WT (comprising residues A25-D976), the Flag-tagged engineered EPHA1 L448-D976 and L463-D976 truncated forms, and EGFP as a control. Immunoblotting for tyrosine phosphorylation (pTyr), S906 phosphorylation, and the Flag tag demonstrates high phosphorylation of the EPHA1 engineered truncated forms. " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: The Journal of Biological Chemistry
Article Title: Missense mutations of the ephrin receptor EPHA1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease disrupt receptor signaling functions
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.108099
Figure Lengend Snippet: Some Alzheimer’s mutations disrupt EPHA1 tyrosine and S906 phosphorylation. A , Flag immunoprecipitates (IPs) from transiently transfected HEK293 cells were probed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. The graphs show means and SEs for the quantifications of EPHA1 tyrosine phosphorylation (pTyr, n = 5) and S906 phosphorylation (pS906, n = 6) normalized to EPHA1 levels in the upper of the two bands detected with the EPHA1 SAM antibody (which corresponds to the phosphorylated band). Individual data points are shown as black dots. ∗, p < 0.05 and ∗∗, p < 0.01 for the comparison with EPHA1 WT using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. B , HEK293 cells stably expressing Flag-tagged EPHA1 WT or P460L mutant were stimulated with ephrinA1-Fc for the indicated times and Flag immunoprecipitates were probed by immunoblotting for phosphotyrosine (pTyr) or EPHA1. C and D , quantifications of the immunoblots in (B) and others (n = 5). The basal EPHA1 tyrosine phosphorylation (pTyr) signal was normalized to EPHA1 levels in the absence of ephrinA1-Fc stimulation and then further normalized to the pTyr/EPHA1 WT signal at 30 min of ephrinA1-Fc stimulation. The graph in (C) shows means and SEs and the individual data points are shown as black dots. ∗, p < 0.05 by unpaired Student’s t test. The graph in (D) shows means ± SEs from five experiments. E , experiment similar to A, but using a longer exposure to visualize the EPHA1 60 kDa fragment co-immunoprecipitated with full-length EPHA1 as in Fig. 3 , D and E . The graphs show means and SEs for the quantifications of EPHA1 tyrosine phosphorylation (pTyr, n = 5) and S906 phosphorylation (pS906, n = 5) normalized to EPHA1 levels. The P460L mutant fragment could not be reliably quantified given its very low level. ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001 for the comparison with WT using one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. F , HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with Flag-tagged EPHA1 WT (comprising residues A25-D976), the Flag-tagged engineered EPHA1 L448-D976 and L463-D976 truncated forms, and EGFP as a control. Immunoblotting for tyrosine phosphorylation (pTyr), S906 phosphorylation, and the Flag tag demonstrates high phosphorylation of the EPHA1 engineered truncated forms.
Article Snippet: The immune serum was affinity purified using the His-tagged EPHA1 protein coupled to an Affi-Gel 10 column (1536046; Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Techniques: Phospho-proteomics, Transfection, Western Blot, Comparison, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Immunoprecipitation, Control, FLAG-tag